In 1998, psychologist Arthur Graesser examined the real-time components of speech and reading comprehension. See [Einstein’s Dreams]. Components of comprehension include things like ‘syntax parsing’, ‘semantic processing’, ‘unexpected event-handling’ and ‘resolution’. They can be measured in milliseconds. Using an interactive computer-presentation, he recorded the time students spent at each component-step. Sort of like a reaction-time study. What he found was counterintuitive. Comprehension scores were actually higher for students who took longer to process the semantic and unexpected components of a narrative. Students who spent less time performing these tasks scored lower. On closer examination, he found that they were interpreting events way too fast to derive the most likely meaning. Neglecting these early steps also put them at greater risk of misunderstanding whatever happened next. What this tells me is that receptivity and a sense of wonder are far more important than coming to the most expedient conclusion when following what another person is saying.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Thoughtful, as always.
. . . between the point of conception and the point of conclusion there are points of purpose, that is a line of thought . . .
Thanks Cantoral ..
I like that Brad ..very insightful! You sound like Wm James.
Don't forget to mention points of divergence somewhere between.
Thanks
Post a Comment