Tuesday, May 5, 2009

legal sense

Common Law?

Societies* suggest morality,
Governments impose law.
The law makes us buy insurance,
invest (pay) in disasters that may never happen,
and work to assure that the chances are less.
When we* are made desperate for time
morality suffers and ironically the most
desperate symptoms are both extremes
of the economic scale.
Those that lost the most money had the most,
this makes them defensive for how they got it,
even more, when obviously complicit for the problem.
Is government complicity finally being admitted from within?
Could these be the new revolutionaries that overthrow the
monarch money with three branches of credit so that
information and service stop creating debt?
Only industry is an indulgence (and deserves taxation.)

4 comments:

Oberon said...

...write on brother...write on.

brinni for humanity said...

financial revolution . . . what a concept. an economy based on something other than the credit-insurance-bankruptcy-bailout cycle? it enthralls me to think of it in my lifetime :)

A Cuban In London said...

The never-ending cycle. Many thanks.

Greetings from London.

Marcos Freitas said...

the monetary system is a failure by design, it needs scarcety to maximize profit, a society absolutely full of divisions, differences, classes, etc, etc, and all kinds of taxes, taxes, taxes and more taxes... of course, a huge amount of debt slaves ...to fill up a few masters pools! this fucking system serves only for selffeeding itself... and if ANYthing goes wrong, we pay the bill!

non compliance, non obedience, and many others "deviants" behaviours may be the only way out of this shit system... every well aware adult human being should turn him/herself into a "free man on the land"... with no borders, no certificates, no docs, no IDs, no lawyers, no licences, no statutes, no NOs... and YES, only our own yessesthanks and congrats for this post!
p.s. pardon for the too long comment! heheheh